Best Local AI Models for NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti (16 GB VRAM)
The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~32.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture featuring GDDR7 256-bit delivering 896 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. Efficient 16 GB performer: ideal for running quantized 14B Q8 and 32B models locally.
Equipped with 16 GB of dedicated VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti can run 33 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen3-8B-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF. For a comprehensive breakdown of compatible model weights, see our guide to the best LLMs for 16 GB VRAM.
With a memory bandwidth of 896 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~149.3 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 300W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti compares with similar cards
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 5080, the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 7% slower token generation (~149 vs ~160 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 896 vs 960 GB/s) and a lower board power (300 vs 400 W). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super, the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 22% faster token generation (~149 vs ~123 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 896 vs 736 GB/s); a lower board power (300 vs 320 W) and a newer architecture (Blackwell vs Ada Lovelace). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4080, the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 25% faster token generation (~149 vs ~120 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 896 vs 717 GB/s); a lower board power (300 vs 320 W) and a newer architecture (Blackwell vs Ada Lovelace). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
33 fit fully in VRAM · 5 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
110.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
5.35 GB
|
224.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
63.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | BF16 | Excellent |
14.87 GB
|
63.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | F16 | Very good |
13.74 GB
|
69.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | IQ3_M | Fair |
15.59 GB
|
65.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
4.23 GB
|
270.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | Q4_K_XL | Good |
14.73 GB
|
64.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
14.88 GB
|
65.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
759.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
13.02 GB
|
74.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K | Excellent |
12.71 GB
|
79.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
63.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
606.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.08 GB
|
277.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
14.45 GB
|
66.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | GGUF | Excellent |
9.59 GB
|
109.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | GGUF | Excellent |
7.27 GB
|
141.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
14.62 GB
|
65.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
112.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | F16 | Excellent |
7.23 GB
|
149.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
410.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| lmstudio-community/gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF | 1.0B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.96 GB
|
899.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
15.99 GB
|
59.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
1504.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | BF16 | Excellent |
2.64 GB
|
637.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.45 GB
|
279.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M-GGUF | 0.35B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.51 GB
|
1352.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K | Excellent |
12.84 GB
|
79.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
11.44 GB
|
88.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF | 33.12B | Q3_K_S | Fair |
15.78 GB
|
63.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
507.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K_L | Excellent |
13.19 GB
|
77.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF | 125.09B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
47.01 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
32.1 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF | 70.55B | Q5_K_S | Very good |
47.53 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| google/gemma-7b | 8.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
33.11 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | Q4_1 | Very good |
47.79 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti's 896 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti?
The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti features 16 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 896 GB/s (GDDR7 256-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti?
The best overall model for the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti is Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF using the recommended Q8_0 quantization (9.47 GB total memory). With 16 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs a 14B at high quality, or a 24–27B at 4-bit at full GPU speed. Check our guide to the best LLMs for 16 GB VRAM for details.
Can the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti run 14B and 32B models?
Yes. A 16 GB VRAM buffer allows you to run 14B models (like Qwen 2.5 14B or DeepSeek-R1 14B) in high-fidelity Q8_0 quantizations, or 32B models (like Qwen 2.5 32B) in Q3_K_M or Q4_K_M quantizations fully on the GPU.
What power supply (PSU) do you need for the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti when running local AI?
The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti has a rated TDP of 300W. While local inference typically draws less power than full 3D rasterization or gaming, continuous token generation can sustain high loads. A quality power supply of at least 600W is strongly recommended.
NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
RTX 5070 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4070 Ti Super 16GB
Next-gen Blackwell 16GB (896 GB/s) vs proven Ada 16GB workhorse.
NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 4090
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.
NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.