Best Local AI Models for NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (16 GB VRAM)
The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~32.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture featuring GDDR6 128-bit delivering 288 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. The lowest entry price for 16 GB VRAM: allows running 14B Q8 and 32B models that 12GB cards cannot touch.
Equipped with 16 GB of dedicated VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB can run 33 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen3-8B-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF. For a comprehensive breakdown of compatible model weights, see our guide to the best LLMs for 16 GB VRAM.
With a memory bandwidth of 288 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~48.0 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 165W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB compares with similar cards
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 36% slower token generation (~48 vs ~75 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 288 vs 448 GB/s); a lower board power (165 vs 180 W) and an older architecture (Ada Lovelace vs Blackwell). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super, the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 57% slower token generation (~48 vs ~112 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 288 vs 672 GB/s) and a lower board power (165 vs 285 W). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4080, the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 60% slower token generation (~48 vs ~120 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 288 vs 717 GB/s) and a lower board power (165 vs 320 W). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
33 fit fully in VRAM · 5 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
35.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
5.35 GB
|
72.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
20.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | BF16 | Excellent |
14.87 GB
|
20.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | F16 | Very good |
13.74 GB
|
22.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | IQ3_M | Fair |
15.59 GB
|
20.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
4.23 GB
|
86.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | Q4_K_XL | Good |
14.73 GB
|
20.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
14.88 GB
|
21.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
244.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
13.02 GB
|
23.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K | Excellent |
12.71 GB
|
25.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
20.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
194.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.08 GB
|
89.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
14.45 GB
|
21.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | GGUF | Excellent |
9.59 GB
|
35.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | GGUF | Excellent |
7.27 GB
|
45.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
14.62 GB
|
21.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
36.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | F16 | Excellent |
7.23 GB
|
48.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
132.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| lmstudio-community/gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF | 1.0B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.96 GB
|
289.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
15.99 GB
|
19.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
483.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | BF16 | Excellent |
2.64 GB
|
204.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.45 GB
|
89.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M-GGUF | 0.35B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.51 GB
|
434.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K | Excellent |
12.84 GB
|
25.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
11.44 GB
|
28.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF | 33.12B | Q3_K_S | Fair |
15.78 GB
|
20.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
163.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K_L | Excellent |
13.19 GB
|
24.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF | 125.09B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
47.01 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
32.1 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF | 70.55B | Q5_K_S | Very good |
47.53 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| google/gemma-7b | 8.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
33.11 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | Q4_1 | Very good |
47.79 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's 288 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?
The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB features 16 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 288 GB/s (GDDR6 128-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?
The best overall model for the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF using the recommended Q8_0 quantization (9.47 GB total memory). With 16 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs a 14B at high quality, or a 24–27B at 4-bit at full GPU speed. Check our guide to the best LLMs for 16 GB VRAM for details.
Can the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB run 14B and 32B models?
Yes. A 16 GB VRAM buffer allows you to run 14B models (like Qwen 2.5 14B or DeepSeek-R1 14B) in high-fidelity Q8_0 quantizations, or 32B models (like Qwen 2.5 32B) in Q3_K_M or Q4_K_M quantizations fully on the GPU.
NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
RTX 3060 12GB vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The sub-$300 12 GB champion against the entry-level 16 GB card.
Intel Arc A770 16GB vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The cheapest 16 GB VRAM GPUs compared for open-source LLM inference.
AMD RX 7600 XT 16GB vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Budget 16 GB shootout: AMD ROCm/Vulkan vs NVIDIA CUDA.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4070 12GB
16 GB capacity vs 504 GB/s memory bandwidth: the key mid-range dilemma.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 5070 12GB
16 GB VRAM headroom vs faster 12 GB generation speeds.