Best Local AI Models for Intel Arc A770 (16 GB VRAM)
The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~32.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The Intel Arc A770 is built on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture featuring GDDR6 256-bit delivering 560 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. Intel's budget 16 GB challenger: 560 GB/s bandwidth supported via IPEX-LLM and llama.cpp SYCL.
Equipped with 16 GB of dedicated VRAM, the Intel Arc A770 can run 33 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen3-8B-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF. For a comprehensive breakdown of compatible model weights, see our guide to the best LLMs for 16 GB VRAM.
With a memory bandwidth of 560 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~93.3 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 225W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the Intel Arc A770 compares with similar cards
- Compared with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, the Intel Arc A770 has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 3% slower token generation (~93 vs ~96 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 560 vs 576 GB/s); a lower board power (225 vs 335 W) and a different architecture (Xe-HPG vs RDNA 2). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT / 6800, the Intel Arc A770 has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 9% faster token generation (~93 vs ~85 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 560 vs 512 GB/s); a lower board power (225 vs 300 W) and a different architecture (Xe-HPG vs RDNA 2). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, the Intel Arc A770 has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 10% slower token generation (~93 vs ~104 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 560 vs 624 GB/s); a lower board power (225 vs 263 W) and a different architecture (Xe-HPG vs RDNA 3). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
33 fit fully in VRAM · 5 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
69.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
5.35 GB
|
140.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
39.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | BF16 | Excellent |
14.87 GB
|
39.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | F16 | Very good |
13.74 GB
|
43.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | IQ3_M | Fair |
15.59 GB
|
40.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
4.23 GB
|
168.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | Q4_K_XL | Good |
14.73 GB
|
40.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
14.88 GB
|
40.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
474.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
13.02 GB
|
46.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K | Excellent |
12.71 GB
|
49.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
39.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
378.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.08 GB
|
173.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
14.45 GB
|
41.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | GGUF | Excellent |
9.59 GB
|
68.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | GGUF | Excellent |
7.27 GB
|
88.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
14.62 GB
|
41.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
70.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | F16 | Excellent |
7.23 GB
|
93.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
256.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| lmstudio-community/gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF | 1.0B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.96 GB
|
562.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
15.99 GB
|
37.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
940.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | BF16 | Excellent |
2.64 GB
|
398.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.45 GB
|
174.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M-GGUF | 0.35B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.51 GB
|
845.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K | Excellent |
12.84 GB
|
49.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
11.44 GB
|
55.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF | 33.12B | Q3_K_S | Fair |
15.78 GB
|
39.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
317.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K_L | Excellent |
13.19 GB
|
48.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF | 125.09B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
47.01 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
32.1 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF | 70.55B | Q5_K_S | Very good |
47.53 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| google/gemma-7b | 8.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
33.11 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | Q4_1 | Very good |
47.79 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the Intel Arc A770's 560 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A770?
The Intel Arc A770 features 16 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 560 GB/s (GDDR6 256-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a Intel Arc A770?
The best overall model for the Intel Arc A770 is Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF using the recommended Q8_0 quantization (9.47 GB total memory). With 16 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs a 14B at high quality, or a 24–27B at 4-bit at full GPU speed. Check our guide to the best LLMs for 16 GB VRAM for details.
Can the Intel Arc A770 run 14B and 32B models?
Yes. A 16 GB VRAM buffer allows you to run 14B models (like Qwen 2.5 14B or DeepSeek-R1 14B) in high-fidelity Q8_0 quantizations, or 32B models (like Qwen 2.5 32B) in Q3_K_M or Q4_K_M quantizations fully on the GPU.
How do you run local LLMs on an Intel Arc card like the Intel Arc A770?
Intel Arc GPUs run local AI models using the llama.cpp SYCL backend or Intel's IPEX-LLM library. Popular frontends like LM Studio and Ollama provide experimental or DirectML/Vulkan support for Arc hardware.
Intel Arc A770 Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
Intel Arc A770 16GB vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The cheapest 16 GB VRAM GPUs compared for open-source LLM inference.
Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA RTX 4090
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.
Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.