Best Local AI Models for NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super (16 GB VRAM)
The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super has 16 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~32.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super is built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture featuring GDDR6X 256-bit delivering 672 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. The sweet-spot modern 16 GB card: 256-bit memory bus for superior bandwidth over the non-Super.
Equipped with 16 GB of dedicated VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super can run 33 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen3-8B-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF. For a comprehensive breakdown of compatible model weights, see our guide to the best LLMs for 16 GB VRAM.
With a memory bandwidth of 672 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~112.0 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 285W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super compares with similar cards
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4080, the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 6% slower token generation (~112 vs ~120 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 672 vs 717 GB/s) and a lower board power (285 vs 320 W). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super, the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 9% slower token generation (~112 vs ~123 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 672 vs 736 GB/s) and a lower board power (285 vs 320 W). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super has the same 16 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 50% faster token generation (~112 vs ~75 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 672 vs 448 GB/s); a higher board power (285 vs 180 W) and an older architecture (Ada Lovelace vs Blackwell). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
33 fit fully in VRAM · 5 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
82.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
5.35 GB
|
168.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
47.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | BF16 | Excellent |
14.87 GB
|
47.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | F16 | Very good |
13.74 GB
|
52.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | IQ3_M | Fair |
15.59 GB
|
48.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
4.23 GB
|
202.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | Q4_K_XL | Good |
14.73 GB
|
48.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
14.88 GB
|
49.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
569.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
13.02 GB
|
55.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K | Excellent |
12.71 GB
|
59.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
47.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
454.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.08 GB
|
208.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
14.45 GB
|
49.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | GGUF | Excellent |
9.59 GB
|
81.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | GGUF | Excellent |
7.27 GB
|
106.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
14.62 GB
|
49.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
84.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | F16 | Excellent |
7.23 GB
|
112.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
307.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| lmstudio-community/gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF | 1.0B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.96 GB
|
674.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | Q3_K_M | Fair |
15.99 GB
|
44.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
1128.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | BF16 | Excellent |
2.64 GB
|
478.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.45 GB
|
209.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M-GGUF | 0.35B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.51 GB
|
1014.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K | Excellent |
12.84 GB
|
59.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
11.44 GB
|
66.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF | 33.12B | Q3_K_S | Fair |
15.78 GB
|
47.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
380.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q6_K_L | Excellent |
13.19 GB
|
57.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF | 125.09B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
47.01 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
32.1 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF | 70.55B | Q5_K_S | Very good |
47.53 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| google/gemma-7b | 8.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
33.11 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | Q4_1 | Very good |
47.79 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super's 672 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super?
The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super features 16 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 672 GB/s (GDDR6X 256-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super?
The best overall model for the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super is Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF using the recommended Q8_0 quantization (9.47 GB total memory). With 16 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs a 14B at high quality, or a 24–27B at 4-bit at full GPU speed. Check our guide to the best LLMs for 16 GB VRAM for details.
Can the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super run 14B and 32B models?
Yes. A 16 GB VRAM buffer allows you to run 14B models (like Qwen 2.5 14B or DeepSeek-R1 14B) in high-fidelity Q8_0 quantizations, or 32B models (like Qwen 2.5 32B) in Q3_K_M or Q4_K_M quantizations fully on the GPU.
NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
RTX 4070 Super vs RTX 4070 Ti Super
Is the jump from 12 GB to 16 GB worth the price difference for local AI?
RTX 4070 Ti 12GB vs RTX 4070 Ti Super 16GB
192-bit 12GB vs 256-bit 16GB: unlocking 32B quantized models.
RTX 5070 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4070 Ti Super 16GB
Next-gen Blackwell 16GB (896 GB/s) vs proven Ada 16GB workhorse.
AMD RX 7900 XT 20GB vs RTX 4070 Ti Super 16GB
Generous 20 GB VRAM buffer vs 16 GB NVIDIA CUDA ecosystem.
RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 4070 Ti Super 16GB
Used 24 GB monster vs modern brand-new 16 GB: which to buy for LLMs?