Best Local AI Models for NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24 GB VRAM)
The NVIDIA RTX 4090 has 24 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~32.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The NVIDIA RTX 4090 is built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture featuring GDDR6X 384-bit delivering 1008 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. The flagship 24 GB gold standard: over 1 TB/s bandwidth delivers blistering 100+ tokens/s on 8B–14B models.
Equipped with 24 GB of dedicated VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 4090 can run 36 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen3-8B-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF. For a comprehensive breakdown of compatible model weights, see our guide to the best LLMs for 24 GB VRAM.
With a memory bandwidth of 1008 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~168.0 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 450W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the NVIDIA RTX 4090 compares with similar cards
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti, the NVIDIA RTX 4090 has the same 24 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; the same 1008 GB/s of memory bandwidth, so the same estimated ~168 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4 and a newer architecture (Ada Lovelace vs Ampere). For local LLMs the two generate tokens at the same speed: the difference comes down to GPU compute, which mainly affects prompt processing. Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 3090, the NVIDIA RTX 4090 has the same 24 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 8% faster token generation (~168 vs ~156 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 1008 vs 936 GB/s); a higher board power (450 vs 350 W) and a newer architecture (Ada Lovelace vs Ampere). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, the NVIDIA RTX 4090 has the same 24 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 5% faster token generation (~168 vs ~160 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 1008 vs 960 GB/s); a higher board power (450 vs 355 W) and a different architecture (Ada Lovelace vs RDNA 3). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
36 fit fully in VRAM · 2 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
124.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
5.35 GB
|
252.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
71.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | BF16 | Excellent |
14.87 GB
|
71.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | F16 | Very good |
13.74 GB
|
78.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | Q5_K_L | Very good |
23.91 GB
|
45.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
4.23 GB
|
304.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | Q6_K_XL | Excellent |
21.24 GB
|
49.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | Q5_K_XL | Very good |
21.42 GB
|
49.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
854.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | BF16 | Excellent |
17.61 GB
|
60.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.05 GB
|
68.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
71.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
682.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.08 GB
|
312.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | Q3_K_XL | Fair |
18.13 GB
|
58.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | GGUF | Excellent |
9.59 GB
|
122.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | GGUF | Excellent |
7.27 GB
|
159.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | Q5_K_XL | Very good |
21.21 GB
|
49.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
126.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | F16 | Excellent |
7.23 GB
|
168.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
461.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| lmstudio-community/gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF | 1.0B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.96 GB
|
1012.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | Q5_K_S | Very good |
23.38 GB
|
44.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q4_0 | Good |
18.42 GB
|
57.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
1692.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | BF16 | Excellent |
2.64 GB
|
717.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF | 70.55B | IQ2_S | Very low |
22.93 GB
|
48.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.45 GB
|
314.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M-GGUF | 0.35B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.51 GB
|
1521.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.17 GB
|
68.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | IQ2_XXS | Very low |
22.89 GB
|
46.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | BF16 | Excellent |
16.63 GB
|
66.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF | 33.12B | Q5_K_S | Very good |
23.65 GB
|
45.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
571.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.17 GB
|
68.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF | 125.09B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
47.01 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| google/gemma-7b | 8.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
33.11 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the NVIDIA RTX 4090's 1008 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 4090?
The NVIDIA RTX 4090 features 24 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 1008 GB/s (GDDR6X 384-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a NVIDIA RTX 4090?
The best overall model for the NVIDIA RTX 4090 is Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF using the recommended Q8_0 quantization (9.47 GB total memory). With 24 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs a 30–35B model at Q5, fully on the GPU at full GPU speed. Check our guide to the best LLMs for 24 GB VRAM for details.
Can the NVIDIA RTX 4090 run 70B parameter models like Llama 3.3 70B?
Yes. With 24 GB of VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 4090 can run 70B parameter models quantized to 3-bit or 4-bit (such as IQ3_M or Q4_K_M) with moderate context windows (4k tokens). For larger context windows (16k+), pairing with a second GPU or slight CPU offloading may be required.
What power supply (PSU) do you need for the NVIDIA RTX 4090 when running local AI?
The NVIDIA RTX 4090 has a rated TDP of 450W. While local inference typically draws less power than full 3D rasterization or gaming, continuous token generation can sustain high loads. A quality power supply of at least 750W is strongly recommended.
NVIDIA RTX 4090 Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 4090 24GB
Used $700 value king vs $1,800 flagship: same 24 GB VRAM, double the speed.
RTX 4080 Super 16GB vs RTX 4090 24GB
16 GB vs 24 GB: the hard boundary between 14B and 70B models.
RTX 5090 32GB vs RTX 4090 24GB
32 GB GDDR7 (1,792 GB/s) vs 24 GB: what new models become possible.
AMD RX 7900 XTX vs NVIDIA RTX 4090
24 GB VRAM faceoff: ROCm vs CUDA for local open-weights AI.