Best Local AI Models for NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti (24 GB VRAM)
The NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~32.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti is built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture featuring GDDR6X 384-bit delivering 1008 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. High-bandwidth 24 GB enthusiast card: capable of running 70B quantizations with serious power draw.
Equipped with 24 GB of dedicated VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti can run 36 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen3-8B-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF. For a comprehensive breakdown of compatible model weights, see our guide to the best LLMs for 24 GB VRAM.
With a memory bandwidth of 1008 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~168.0 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 450W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti compares with similar cards
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4090, the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti has the same 24 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; the same 1008 GB/s of memory bandwidth, so the same estimated ~168 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4 and an older architecture (Ampere vs Ada Lovelace). For local LLMs the two generate tokens at the same speed: the difference comes down to GPU compute, which mainly affects prompt processing. Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 3090, the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti has the same 24 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 8% faster token generation (~168 vs ~156 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 1008 vs 936 GB/s) and a higher board power (450 vs 350 W). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti has the same 24 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 5% faster token generation (~168 vs ~160 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 1008 vs 960 GB/s); a higher board power (450 vs 355 W) and a different architecture (Ampere vs RDNA 3). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
36 fit fully in VRAM · 2 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
124.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
5.35 GB
|
252.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
71.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | BF16 | Excellent |
14.87 GB
|
71.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | F16 | Very good |
13.74 GB
|
78.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | Q5_K_L | Very good |
23.91 GB
|
45.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
4.23 GB
|
304.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | Q6_K_XL | Excellent |
21.24 GB
|
49.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | Q5_K_XL | Very good |
21.42 GB
|
49.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
854.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | BF16 | Excellent |
17.61 GB
|
60.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.05 GB
|
68.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | GGUF | Excellent |
15.21 GB
|
71.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
682.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.08 GB
|
312.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | Q3_K_XL | Fair |
18.13 GB
|
58.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | GGUF | Excellent |
9.59 GB
|
122.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | GGUF | Excellent |
7.27 GB
|
159.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | Q5_K_XL | Very good |
21.21 GB
|
49.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
126.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | F16 | Excellent |
7.23 GB
|
168.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
461.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| lmstudio-community/gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF | 1.0B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.96 GB
|
1012.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | Q5_K_S | Very good |
23.38 GB
|
44.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q4_0 | Good |
18.42 GB
|
57.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
1692.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | BF16 | Excellent |
2.64 GB
|
717.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF | 70.55B | IQ2_S | Very low |
22.93 GB
|
48.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.45 GB
|
314.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M-GGUF | 0.35B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.51 GB
|
1521.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.17 GB
|
68.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | IQ2_XXS | Very low |
22.89 GB
|
46.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | BF16 | Excellent |
16.63 GB
|
66.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF | 33.12B | Q5_K_S | Very good |
23.65 GB
|
45.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
571.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.17 GB
|
68.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF | 125.09B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
47.01 GB
|
1.1 t/s | Offload |
| google/gemma-7b | 8.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
33.11 GB
|
1.6 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti's 1008 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti?
The NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti features 24 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 1008 GB/s (GDDR6X 384-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti?
The best overall model for the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti is Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF using the recommended Q8_0 quantization (9.47 GB total memory). With 24 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs a 30–35B model at Q5, fully on the GPU at full GPU speed. Check our guide to the best LLMs for 24 GB VRAM for details.
Can the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti run 70B parameter models like Llama 3.3 70B?
Yes. With 24 GB of VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti can run 70B parameter models quantized to 3-bit or 4-bit (such as IQ3_M or Q4_K_M) with moderate context windows (4k tokens). For larger context windows (16k+), pairing with a second GPU or slight CPU offloading may be required.
What power supply (PSU) do you need for the NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti when running local AI?
The NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti has a rated TDP of 450W. While local inference typically draws less power than full 3D rasterization or gaming, continuous token generation can sustain high loads. A quality power supply of at least 750W is strongly recommended.
NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
RTX 3090 Ti 24GB vs RTX 3090 24GB
Is the 450W Ti variant worth the extra heat for local inference?
NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 5090
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.
NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 4090
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.