Best Local AI Models for AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (12 GB VRAM)
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~16.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on AMD's RDNA 2 architecture featuring GDDR6 192-bit delivering 432 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. A refreshed RX 6700 XT with faster memory (432 GB/s, about 12% quicker token generation). It matches the newer RX 7700 XT for generation speed, since both have 12 GB on a 192-bit bus; 7B–12B models fit in VRAM in 4-bit quantization.
Equipped with 12 GB of dedicated VRAM, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT can run 33 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen3-8B-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF. For a comprehensive breakdown of compatible model weights, see our guide to the best LLMs for 12 GB VRAM.
With a memory bandwidth of 432 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~72.0 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 250W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT compares with similar cards
- Compared with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has the same 12 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; the same 432 GB/s of memory bandwidth, so the same estimated ~72 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4; a higher board power (250 vs 245 W) and an older architecture (RDNA 2 vs RDNA 3). For local LLMs the two generate tokens at the same speed: the difference comes down to GPU compute, which mainly affects prompt processing. Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has the same 12 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 12% faster token generation (~72 vs ~64 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 432 vs 384 GB/s) and a higher board power (250 vs 230 W). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the Intel Arc B580, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has the same 12 GB of VRAM, so the same models fit fully on the GPU; about 5% slower token generation (~72 vs ~76 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 432 vs 456 GB/s); a higher board power (250 vs 190 W) and a different architecture (RDNA 2 vs Battlemage). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
33 fit fully in VRAM · 3 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
53.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
5.35 GB
|
108.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
8.56 GB
|
57.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
8.48 GB
|
56.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | Q4_K_XL | Good |
11.95 GB
|
39.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | IQ2_S | Very low |
11.47 GB
|
44.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
4.23 GB
|
130.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | Q3_K_XL | Fair |
11.07 GB
|
42.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | Q2_K_L | Low |
11.73 GB
|
40.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
366.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.8 GB
|
48.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q5_K_M | Very good |
11.22 GB
|
44.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
8.56 GB
|
57.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
292.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.08 GB
|
133.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | IQ2_XXS | Very low |
11.95 GB
|
39.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | GGUF | Excellent |
9.59 GB
|
52.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | GGUF | Excellent |
7.27 GB
|
68.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | Q2_K_L | Low |
11.64 GB
|
40.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
54.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | F16 | Excellent |
7.23 GB
|
72.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
197.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| lmstudio-community/gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF | 1.0B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.96 GB
|
433.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | IQ2_S | Very low |
11.13 GB
|
42.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
725.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | BF16 | Excellent |
2.64 GB
|
307.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.45 GB
|
134.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M-GGUF | 0.35B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.51 GB
|
652.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q5_K_M | Very good |
11.34 GB
|
44.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
11.44 GB
|
42.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF | 33.12B | IQ2_S | Low |
12.0 GB
|
41.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
244.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q5_K_L | Very good |
11.78 GB
|
42.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q4_0 | Good |
18.42 GB
|
2.8 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF | 70.55B | Q2_K_L | Low |
27.74 GB
|
2.0 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
27.7 GB
|
1.9 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT's 432 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT features 12 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 432 GB/s (GDDR6 192-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?
The best overall model for the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF using the recommended Q8_0 quantization (9.47 GB total memory). With 12 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs a 14B model at Q5, comfortably at full GPU speed. Check our guide to the best LLMs for 12 GB VRAM for details.
Can the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT run 14B models locally?
Yes. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT's 12 GB VRAM is the exact sweet spot for running 14B models (such as Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B) in Q4_K_M quantization (~9.2 GB footprint) with full 4,096-token context entirely in VRAM.
Does the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT work with Ollama and LM Studio?
Yes. Under Linux, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT supports native ROCm acceleration in Ollama and llama.cpp. On Windows, Ollama and LM Studio utilize the Vulkan or DirectML backends to leverage the card's full 12 GB VRAM pool.
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA RTX 5080
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.