Best Local AI Models for NVIDIA RTX 3080 (10 GB VRAM)
The NVIDIA RTX 3080 has 10 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~16.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The NVIDIA RTX 3080 is built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture featuring GDDR6X 320-bit delivering 760 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. High bandwidth 10 GB card: very fast for 8B models, though constrained by 10 GB capacity for 14B.
Equipped with 10 GB of dedicated VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 3080 can run 29 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen3-8B-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF. For a comprehensive breakdown of compatible model weights, see our guide to the best LLMs for 8 GB VRAM.
With a memory bandwidth of 760 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~126.7 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 320W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the NVIDIA RTX 3080 compares with similar cards
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti, the NVIDIA RTX 3080 has 1 GB less VRAM (10 vs 11 GB), so fewer models fit fully on the GPU; about 23% faster token generation (~127 vs ~103 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 760 vs 616 GB/s); a higher board power (320 vs 250 W) and a newer architecture (Ampere vs Turing). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 5070, the NVIDIA RTX 3080 has 2 GB less VRAM (10 vs 12 GB), so fewer models fit fully on the GPU; about 13% faster token generation (~127 vs ~112 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 760 vs 672 GB/s); a higher board power (320 vs 250 W) and an older architecture (Ampere vs Blackwell). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti, the NVIDIA RTX 3080 has 2 GB more VRAM (10 vs 8 GB), so larger models or longer contexts fit; about 25% faster token generation (~127 vs ~101 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 760 vs 608 GB/s) and a higher board power (320 vs 290 W). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
29 fit fully in VRAM · 7 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
93.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
5.35 GB
|
190.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
8.56 GB
|
100.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
8.48 GB
|
99.6 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | GGUF | Excellent |
4.23 GB
|
229.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | IQ3_XXS | Low |
9.22 GB
|
91.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | IQ1_S | Very low |
9.48 GB
|
91.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
644.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.8 GB
|
85.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q4_K_M | Good |
9.81 GB
|
90.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
8.56 GB
|
100.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
514.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.08 GB
|
235.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | GGUF | Excellent |
9.59 GB
|
92.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | GGUF | Excellent |
7.27 GB
|
120.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | IQ1_S | Very low |
9.62 GB
|
88.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
95.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | F16 | Excellent |
7.23 GB
|
126.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
348.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| lmstudio-community/gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF | 1.0B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.96 GB
|
763.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | IQ2_XXS | Very low |
9.99 GB
|
83.5 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
1276.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | BF16 | Excellent |
2.64 GB
|
540.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | BF16 | Excellent |
4.45 GB
|
236.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M-GGUF | 0.35B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.51 GB
|
1147.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q4_K_M | Good |
9.92 GB
|
90.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
93.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
430.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q4_K_M | Good |
9.92 GB
|
90.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | F16 | Very good |
13.74 GB
|
3.9 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | Q5_K_L | Very good |
23.91 GB
|
2.3 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | Q4_K_XL | Very good |
24.24 GB
|
2.1 t/s | Offload |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q4_0 | Good |
18.42 GB
|
2.8 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF | 70.55B | IQ2_M | Low |
24.68 GB
|
2.2 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | IQ2_M | Very low |
24.42 GB
|
2.2 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Nanbeige_Nanbeige4.3-33B-GGUF | 33.12B | Q5_K_M | Very good |
24.96 GB
|
2.1 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the NVIDIA RTX 3080's 760 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 3080?
The NVIDIA RTX 3080 features 10 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 760 GB/s (GDDR6X 320-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a NVIDIA RTX 3080?
The best overall model for the NVIDIA RTX 3080 is Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF using the recommended Q8_0 quantization (9.47 GB total memory). With 10 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs a 7–8B model at Q6, entirely in VRAM at full GPU speed. Check our guide to the best LLMs for 8 GB VRAM for details.
What models can you run on an 8 GB GPU like the NVIDIA RTX 3080?
With 8 GB of VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 3080 comfortably runs 7B and 8B models (such as Llama 3.1 8B, Mistral 7B, or Qwen 2.5 7B) using Q4_K_M or Q5_K_M quantizations (~5.5 to 6.8 GB). Running 14B models requires offloading memory to system RAM, which lowers token generation speed.
What power supply (PSU) do you need for the NVIDIA RTX 3080 when running local AI?
The NVIDIA RTX 3080 has a rated TDP of 320W. While local inference typically draws less power than full 3D rasterization or gaming, continuous token generation can sustain high loads. A quality power supply of at least 620W is strongly recommended.
NVIDIA RTX 3080 Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
RTX 3080 10GB vs RTX 3060 12GB
Blazing 760 GB/s bandwidth vs 12 GB capacity: why 14B models fail on 10 GB.
NVIDIA RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA RTX 5080
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.
NVIDIA RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.