Best Local AI Models for NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop (4 GB VRAM)
The NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop has 4 GB of VRAM. Here are the popular AI models it can run locally (4,096-token context, ~16.0 GB system RAM assumed), ranked by popularity.
See also: Best GPU for running local LLMs.
The NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop is built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture featuring GDDR6 128-bit delivering 192 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth. Entry Ampere laptop GPUs: with 4 GB of GDDR6 at 192 GB/s, only models up to about 3B–4B fit in VRAM in 4-bit quantization, while 7B–8B models spill into system RAM and slow down sharply. Each laptop maker sets the power limit (35–80 W).
Equipped with 4 GB of dedicated VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop can run 20 popular open-source models completely in GPU memory without offloading. This includes full-speed execution for weights like Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF, Qwen3-4B-GGUF, LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF.
With a memory bandwidth of 192 GB/s, this card can generate tokens at an estimated peak rate of ~32.0 tokens/second on an 8B parameter model (Q4_K_M). Its rated power draw is 80W TDP, so ensure your system's power supply and case ventilation are adequate for sustained local inferencing.
How the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop compares with similar cards
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4050 Laptop, the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop has 2 GB less VRAM (4 vs 6 GB), so fewer models fit fully on the GPU; the same 192 GB/s of memory bandwidth, so the same estimated ~32 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4; a lower maximum power limit (80 vs 115 W) and an older architecture (Ampere vs Ada Lovelace). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 3060 Laptop, the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop has 2 GB less VRAM (4 vs 6 GB), so fewer models fit fully on the GPU; about 43% slower token generation (~32 vs ~56 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 192 vs 336 GB/s) and a lower maximum power limit (80 vs 115 W). Side-by-side comparison
- Compared with the NVIDIA RTX 4070 / 4060 Laptop, the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop has 4 GB less VRAM (4 vs 8 GB), so fewer models fit fully on the GPU; about 25% slower token generation (~32 vs ~43 tokens/s on an 8B model in Q4, from 192 vs 256 GB/s); a lower maximum power limit (80 vs 115 W) and an older architecture (Ampere vs Ada Lovelace). Side-by-side comparison
Token speeds here are a conservative estimate (memory bandwidth ÷ 6, for an 8B model in Q4 that reads about 5 GB of weights per token, plus overhead); prompt processing depends on GPU compute instead.
20 fit fully in VRAM · 16 run with offload
| Model | Size | Quant. | Quality | Memory | Speed~ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | Q2_K | Low |
3.83 GB
|
68.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B-GGUF | 4.02B | Q5_0 | Very good |
3.99 GB
|
73.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF | 2.7B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
3.54 GB
|
71.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
108.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 0.49B | GGUF | Excellent |
2.03 GB
|
162.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF | 7.62B | Q2_K | Low |
3.83 GB
|
68.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| janhq/Jan-v3.5-4B-gguf | 4.41B | Q4_K_M | Good |
3.89 GB
|
75.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.17B | BF16 | Excellent |
3.03 GB
|
88.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.09B | Q6_K | Excellent |
3.54 GB
|
73.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| ggml-org/gpt-oss-120b-GGUF | 116.83B | BF16 | Very low |
2.42 GB
|
129.9 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-230M-GGUF | 0.23B | BF16 | Excellent |
1.28 GB
|
446.3 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-GGUF | 8.0B | Q8_0 | Very low |
1.23 GB
|
516.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Qwen3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.72B | Q8_K_XL | Excellent |
3.41 GB
|
88.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.54B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.67 GB
|
108.8 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GGUF | 0.75B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
1.83 GB
|
322.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-GGUF | 3.21B | Q6_K | Excellent |
3.7 GB
|
78.0 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | IQ2_XXS | Very low |
3.79 GB
|
79.2 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct-GGUF | 1.24B | F16 | Excellent |
3.3 GB
|
83.1 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B-GGUF | 7.62B | Q2_K | Low |
3.83 GB
|
68.4 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF | 1.73B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
2.57 GB
|
111.7 t/s | Fits in VRAM |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF | 32.76B | Q4_K_S | Good |
19.29 GB
|
2.9 t/s | Offload |
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B-GGUF | 8.19B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.47 GB
|
6.2 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF | 20.91B | F16 | Very good |
13.74 GB
|
3.9 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF | 30.53B | Q4_1 | Very good |
19.05 GB
|
2.8 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Ornith-1.0-9B-GGUF | — | BF16 | Excellent |
17.61 GB
|
3.0 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF | 8.03B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
9.23 GB
|
6.3 t/s | Offload |
| Qwen/Qwen3-14B-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.05 GB
|
3.4 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Kwaipilot_KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-GGUF | 34.66B | Q4_0 | Good |
19.45 GB
|
2.7 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/GLM-4.7-Flash-GGUF | 31.22B | Q4_1 | Good |
18.68 GB
|
2.8 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/flint-GGUF | 39.79B | Q3_K_XL | Fair |
18.13 GB
|
2.9 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B-GGUF | 34.66B | IQ4_NL | Fair |
17.75 GB
|
3.0 t/s | Offload |
| LiquidAI/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-GGUF | 23.97B | Q6_K | Excellent |
19.22 GB
|
2.7 t/s | Offload |
| ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF | 31.58B | Q4_0 | Good |
18.42 GB
|
2.8 t/s | Offload |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.17 GB
|
3.4 t/s | Offload |
| bartowski/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF | 14.77B | Q8_0 | Excellent |
16.17 GB
|
3.4 t/s | Offload |
| unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF | 79.67B | TQ1_0 | Very low |
18.82 GB
|
2.8 t/s | Offload |
"Fits in VRAM" = fast, fully on GPU. "Offload" = part on system RAM, slower. Speed is a rough estimate from the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop's 192 GB/s memory bandwidth (offloaded models are limited by system RAM).
Frequently asked questions
What is the VRAM and memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop?
The NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop features 4 GB of VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 192 GB/s (GDDR6 128-bit). In local language model inference, VRAM determines which model sizes fit on the card, while memory bandwidth dictates how many tokens per second the GPU generates.
What is the best local AI model to run on a NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop?
The best overall model for the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop is Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF using the recommended Q2_K quantization (3.83 GB total memory). With 4 GB of VRAM, this GPU typically runs smaller models, typically up to about 3–4B at full GPU speed.
What models can you run on an 8 GB GPU like the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop?
With 8 GB of VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop comfortably runs 7B and 8B models (such as Llama 3.1 8B, Mistral 7B, or Qwen 2.5 7B) using Q4_K_M or Q5_K_M quantizations (~5.5 to 6.8 GB). Running 14B models requires offloading memory to system RAM, which lowers token generation speed.
NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop Head-to-Head Comparisons
Compare specs, memory bandwidth, and AI model capability against other graphics cards.
NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop vs NVIDIA RTX 5070
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.
NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop vs NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.
NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti / 3050 Laptop vs NVIDIA RTX 4070 Super
Side-by-side local AI performance and supported model comparison.